Questão 50 · Língua Inglesa: Interpretação de textos
Texto associado à questão
Based on the preceding text, judge the items that follow.
It’s like a 21st century version of Frankenstein’s monster. Switzerland-based startup FinalSpark claims to have built a unique computer processor made from 16 mini brains developed out of human brain tissue — and they are positioning this “living computer” as an alternative to silicon-based computing. And now, other researchers can remotely access the startup’s biocomputer, the Neuroplatform, to conduct studies on, let’s say, artificial intelligence, which typically requires enormous resources. “One of the biggest advantages of biological computing is that neurons compute information with much less energy than digital computers,” a scientist and strategic advisor wrote in a company blog post. It is estimated that living neurons can use over 1 million times less energy than the current digital processors we use. The startup takes brain organoids, small samples of human brain tissue derived from neural stem cells, and places them in a special environment that keeps these organoids alive. They then hook up these mini brains to specialized electrodes to perform computer processing and digital analog conversions to transform neural activity into digital information. The concept of living computers has been around for quite some time now. Last year, for instance, scientists hooked up neurons to electrical circuits, resulting in a device that could perform voice recognition. These unusual machines have some noteworthy advantages over their silicon-based counterparts, including a significantly smaller carbon footprint. “This is one of the reasons why using living neurons for computations is such a compelling opportunity. Apart from possible improvements in AI model generalization, we could also reduce greenhouse emissions without sacrificing technological progress,” she said. FinalSpark hopes other institutions will tap its Neuroplatform in order to advance biocomputer research, while positioning this tool as the next step in AI computing. As AI companies clamor for resources for data centers, with concerns growing over carbon emissions and water, it’s a novel approach that may just pay off in the long run.
Internet: <futurism.com/neoscope> (adapted).
Biocomputers are more efficient than standard computers because they take less time than the latter to process the same information.
Julgue o item:
Gabarito: ERRADO
Gabarito definitivo divulgado pela banca Cebraspe (TRF6 2025).
Comentário
Gabarito: ERRADO.
O item afirma que biocomputadores são mais eficientes que computadores padrão porque levam menos tempo para processar a mesma informação. No entanto, o texto não menciona a velocidade de processamento como a principal vantagem dos biocomputadores. A eficiência destacada no texto está relacionada ao consumo de energia e à pegada de carbono. O trecho "One of the biggest advantages of biological computing is that neurons compute information with much less energy than digital computers" e "It is estimated that living neurons can use over 1 million times less energy than the current digital processors we use" deixa claro que a vantagem é energética. Além disso, o texto menciona "a significantly smaller carbon footprint" como outro benefício. Não há informação no texto que sugira que os biocomputadores sejam mais rápidos no processamento de dados.
Fundamentos: Interpretação de texto
Comentário gerado pela Cravei IA a partir do enunciado e do gabarito definitivo divulgado pela banca, e conferido por uma verificação automática. A IA pode errar: o gabarito oficial sempre prevalece.
Fonte: prova Cebraspe TRF6 2025 (Técnico Judiciário – Área: Apoio Especializado), questão 50, com o gabarito definitivo da banca. Comentário: Equipe Cravei · como fazemos e revisamos.